<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[GotoSocial created the interactionPolicy for activities, but declined creating a FEP]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>GotoSocial created the interactionPolicy for activities, but declined creating a FEP</p><p>Mastodon used the interactionPolicy and applied it to actor objects and will publish a FEP</p><p>Loops is using both</p><p>This is the magic of the fediverse. </p><p>Any project can innovate and create new extensions to push the fediverse forward.</p><p>And the biggest projects like <span><a href="/user/mastodon%40mastodon.social">@<span>Mastodon</span></a></span> will work to ensure compatibility, no matter how popular your project is, to the best of their ability.</p><p>WE ARE THE FUTURE</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ActivityPub" rel="tag">#<span>ActivityPub</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/fc18fe15-d754-4fbd-9faa-3eaf6fbd66e6/gotosocial-created-the-interactionpolicy-for-activities-but-declined-creating-a-fep</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:36:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/fc18fe15-d754-4fbd-9faa-3eaf6fbd66e6.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:57:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to GotoSocial created the interactionPolicy for activities, but declined creating a FEP on Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:07:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/mariusor%40metalhead.club">@<span>mariusor</span></a></span> I included to the best of their ability for a reason, I'm sure they have valid reasons, as I know from Pixelfed, it's not easy to support things that other platforms do.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/dansup/statuses/116380796670631007</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/dansup/statuses/116380796670631007</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dansup@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:07:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to GotoSocial created the interactionPolicy for activities, but declined creating a FEP on Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:02:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>&gt; And the biggest projects like Mastodon will work to ensure compatibility, no matter how popular your project is, to the best of their ability.</p><p><span><a href="/user/dansup%40mastodon.social">@<span>dansup</span></a></span> I don't mean to be a dick, but that's a load of crap. Mastodon cares about compatibility only when it's convenient for its developers. I have two or three tickets open on their bug tracker asking for their ActivityPub implementation to conform to the spec and they have been ignoring them for multiple years.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://metalhead.club/users/mariusor/statuses/116380779973061490</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://metalhead.club/users/mariusor/statuses/116380779973061490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mariusor@metalhead.club]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:02:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>