<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Hey, Starmer!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Starmer!</p><p>If you want to avoid a Reform Ltd. win in the general election, I suggest three legislative priorities:</p><ul><li>Political funding reform. Require all donations to come from individual eligible voters and cap the amount. Ban all additional contributions and all second jobs for MPs.</li><li>Give the regulator real teeth, including the ability to trigger by elections and bar candidates and parties from standing if they have violated the rules.</li><li>Do the same with the independent press regulator, with the ability to fine news organisations on a scale that increases with every infraction for actively misleading articles. Apply the same regulation to large ‘social media’ (I.e. advertising) platforms.</li></ul><p>Thanks,</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/fbc47e9a-0f9b-47a1-9f2c-0d89e3c02745/hey-starmer</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:44:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/fbc47e9a-0f9b-47a1-9f2c-0d89e3c02745.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 13:23:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hey, Starmer! on Sat, 09 May 2026 19:47:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/ltratt%40mastodon.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>ltratt</span></a></span> </p><p>If you can't take the time required to be an MP off from your job, you can't do the job of MP. It isn't a part-time gig. I wouldn't want someone taking a full patient load as a dentist and being an MP, they'll do at least one of them badly. If you have some requirement to retain certification, you can do some pro bono work to meet the minimum until you return, but you can't take payment.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/david_chisnall/statuses/116546342575190444</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/david_chisnall/statuses/116546342575190444</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[david_chisnall@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 19:47:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hey, Starmer! on Sat, 09 May 2026 18:48:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/david_chisnall%40infosec.exchange">@<span>david_chisnall</span></a></span> Re: second jobs. We increasingly struggle to get good candidates into politics. Surely the last thing we want to do is narrow the pool even further? For example, you'd have to be Sir-Humphrey-brave to stand in a byelection knowing that you have to give up your livelihood, perhaps for only a few months, and then perhaps be worse off than before you started. There are some jobs that are incompatible with being an MP. I don't think I want, say, a dentist to stop practising, though.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/ltratt/statuses/116546109956634532</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/ltratt/statuses/116546109956634532</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ltratt@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 18:48:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hey, Starmer! on Sat, 09 May 2026 16:40:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/allende1973%40todon.nl" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>allende1973</span></a></span> </p><p>I agree, though this is not true of everyone in his party and hopefully repeating calls for this kind of intervention will cause those others to ask the same questions.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/david_chisnall/statuses/116545605267308794</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/david_chisnall/statuses/116545605267308794</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[david_chisnall@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 16:40:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hey, Starmer! on Sat, 09 May 2026 15:18:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/david_chisnall%40infosec.exchange">@<span>david_chisnall</span></a></span> </p><p>Won't happen - but it is intructional to explore why.</p><p>Starmer serves the same interests as Farage. </p><p>That's why.</p><p>A similar analysis applies to the USA - and explains why the Democrats wont implement good legislation. Because they serve the same interests that the GOP does. </p><p>The "difference" between these parties is choreographed performance, to give the public a constrained choice at elections.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://todon.nl/ap/users/116512023332271913/statuses/116545282907854123</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://todon.nl/ap/users/116512023332271913/statuses/116545282907854123</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[allende1973@todon.nl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 15:18:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hey, Starmer! on Sat, 09 May 2026 14:32:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/david_chisnall%40infosec.exchange">@<span>david_chisnall</span></a></span> While you are at it, what you really need in the UK is a sane voting system instead of FPTP.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://scicomm.xyz/users/ananas/statuses/116545103242922747</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://scicomm.xyz/users/ananas/statuses/116545103242922747</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ananas@scicomm.xyz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 14:32:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hey, Starmer! on Sat, 09 May 2026 13:51:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/david_chisnall%40infosec.exchange" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>david_chisnall</span></a></span> this is plugging holes in the boat as it’s capsizing</p><p>if you’re talking a reform that would make a reform win less possible, electoral<br />reform to avoid an FPTP situation might help, but if ghouls like reform are still winning the most votes, the UK is still screwed even with proportional representation (but after the tories fumbled everything for years and voters rewarded them for it, and labour doing nothing after that…)</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.treehouse.systems/users/cb/statuses/116544943143669081</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.treehouse.systems/users/cb/statuses/116544943143669081</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cb@social.treehouse.systems]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 13:51:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hey, Starmer! on Sat, 09 May 2026 13:30:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/david_chisnall%40infosec.exchange">@<span>david_chisnall</span></a></span> There seems to be an attitude that they need to take Reform on in a "fair fight", i.e. treat them at face value as honest political opponents, rather than as a corrupt vehicle for shady monied interests to gain control of the state. I suspect this is an enormous mistake.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/kbm0/statuses/116544858863805891</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mastodon.social/users/kbm0/statuses/116544858863805891</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kbm0@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 13:30:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>