<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[As an ex #government functionary, I have seen first-hand how citizen appeals to authority decisions are handled.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As an ex <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/government" rel="tag">#<span>government</span></a> functionary, I have seen first-hand how citizen appeals to authority decisions are handled. </p><p>Basically, you only stand any chance of getting a reconsideration if that will allow some functionary to stick it to a hated colleague that made the first call. Only then.</p><p>This too will go away once <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/AI" rel="tag">#<span>AI</span></a> models are used to make the calls - there's no personal wins to be had, for anyone. </p><p>We're so screwed. Really.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/f9cc5e33-18cc-45da-a41e-01b2dcb76ed4/as-an-ex-government-functionary-i-have-seen-first-hand-how-citizen-appeals-to-authority-decisions-are-handled.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 04:42:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/f9cc5e33-18cc-45da-a41e-01b2dcb76ed4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 17:52:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>