<![CDATA[I have not updated #OpenBSD yet, BTW.]]>#OpenBSD yet, BTW. Do not feel good with the fact that team still has not responded to the AI-coded tmux update, especially that it sits in source from January. I am aware that Theo said no to AI code in source, but the reality says something else. Utlimately more AI code will leak into the source through tmux, LLVM and other stuff. What is the choice then? even if has no-AI code policy (a little unclear), then it will get the AI code through 3rd party apps in base. has LLVM in base. I am left with 9front, TempleOS, MS-DOS 4 and RedoxOS.

But at the end of day I am hypocrite because I need Fish Linux for y*-dlp and gov websites.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/f508e676-3715-4f8c-984e-7a04bc91cd32/i-have-not-updated-openbsd-yet-btw.RSS for NodeMon, 25 May 2026 20:00:16 GMTWed, 20 May 2026 08:23:58 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I have not updated #OpenBSD yet, BTW. on Wed, 20 May 2026 13:43:13 GMT]]>@bpl https://mastodon.sdf.org/@netbsd/116537862178252362

is clear on policy noAI will be accepted in source. That's why we need to fund the foundation

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://bsd.network/users/jaypatelani/statuses/116607195136715769https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://bsd.network/users/jaypatelani/statuses/116607195136715769Wed, 20 May 2026 13:43:13 GMT