<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Note to ALL:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Note to ALL:</p><p>I am starting to use another hashtag called <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/HackAndLeak" rel="tag">#<span>HackAndLeak</span></a> that I hope others will also use to describe incidents where there has been no indication that any <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/ransomware" rel="tag">#<span>ransomware</span></a> or <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/malware" rel="tag">#<span>malware</span></a> was deployed.  </p><p>It's time we stopped calling most attacks "ransomware" when they are really hack and leak incidents. </p><p>If you agree, how about sharing/boosting this idea and hashtag shift?</p><p>If you don't agree, tell me why so I can argue with you. :))</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ee0dfd7d-7d1f-47d2-b1c5-ad8c5588aca2/note-to-all</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:44:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ee0dfd7d-7d1f-47d2-b1c5-ad8c5588aca2.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:51:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>