<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&amp;gt; The Discrimination Of Being And Indeterminate Sex]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The Discrimination Of Being And Indeterminate Sex</p><p>On Thursday last the UK EHRC, which is in theory at least tasked with<br />improving equalities and human rights, released its guidance to Parliament<br />regarding trans citizens access to single sex spaces, and it is fair to<br />say the guidance is devastating.</p><p>But first a little history. Back in the early 2000s in a case brought<br />before the ECtHR it was ruled that the UK was in breach of human rights<br />law, in that the UK defacto rendered trans citizens an indeterminate<br />third gender. This ruling resulted in the GRA 2004 and the EA 2010<br />resulting in trans people being legally recognised as our acquired<br />gender, within certain bounds. This existed for a decade until it was<br />in essence overturned by the Supreme Court ruling in April 2025 which<br />ruled that under the EA 2010, sex meant "biological sex" without <br />establishing what this means. This created further confusion because,<br />under the EA 2010 it was already possible to discriminate against<br />trans people, albeit with a high bar, on a case by case basis and<br />in order to achieve a legitimate aim. In short, it was always possible<br />for women's groups to exclude trans women albeit within certain<br />bounds.</p><p>This guidance now mandates that trans women only use men's facilities<br />and trans men use women's facilities, unless they look too feminine<br />or masculine in which case they may not, in which case some undefined<br />"third space" must be used. This puts trans people at risk and also<br />forcibly outing us, which is itself against the law. As for the risk, <br />it is highly likely that any such space would become known as "tranny<br />toilets" with all the risk of violence that entails.</p><p>A more chilling possibility is that such guidance would make it effectively<br />impossible for any trans person in the future to medically transition.<br />This is due to the highly pathologised nature of trans medicine whereby<br />a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, which does not exist in ICD11, is<br />required for medical transition and a key part of this is demonstrating<br />living within acquired gender, including the use of appropriate gendered<br />spaces. This guidance will make that last part impossible and illegal.<br />The practical result of this will be to drive trans people from public<br />life. How for example can we go to the pub with our friends if we <br />are unable to use the toilet?</p><p>This must be protested and fought against as the impact will not end <br />with trans people, indeed, already we are seeing cis women being impacted<br />if they do not look feminine enough. To this end protests are due to <br />be held across the UK with some already having been held.</p><p>This is regressive, and must not stand.</p><p><a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/Trans" rel="tag">#<span>Trans</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/Transgender" rel="tag">#<span>Transgender</span></a> <a href="https://lgbtqia.space/tags/TransgenderUK" rel="tag">#<span>TransgenderUK</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ddf49ac0-6e43-4640-a174-9387bdb9b4de/gt-the-discrimination-of-being-and-indeterminate-sex</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 03:57:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ddf49ac0-6e43-4640-a174-9387bdb9b4de.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 11:34:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &amp;gt; The Discrimination Of Being And Indeterminate Sex on Sun, 24 May 2026 12:26:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/seconduniverse%40autistics.life">@<span>SecondUniverse</span></a></span></p><p>As an intersex person myself,  that is my daily lived experience!</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://lgbtqia.space/users/alexadeswift/statuses/116629541740447877</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://lgbtqia.space/users/alexadeswift/statuses/116629541740447877</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexadeswift@lgbtqia.space]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 12:26:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &amp;gt; The Discrimination Of Being And Indeterminate Sex on Sun, 24 May 2026 12:10:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/alexadeswift%40lgbtqia.space">@<span>alexadeswift</span></a></span> The concept of "biological sex" as a meaningful legal classifier is intrinsically intersex phobic. There is no definition of biological sex that does not harm intersex people, and the concept is rejected by the scientific community.</p><p>By the way, intersex status is not a protected characteristic in the UK, which also still performs intersex genital mutilation on infants.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://autistics.life/users/SecondUniverse/statuses/116629478341607249</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://autistics.life/users/SecondUniverse/statuses/116629478341607249</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[seconduniverse@autistics.life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 12:10:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>