<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Everyone wants to know how good #AI is at vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and running automated attacks.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone wants to know how good <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/AI" rel="tag">#<span>AI</span></a> is at vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and running automated attacks. Good, fine. That's useful.</p><p>What we really need, though, is for some of these frontier models to start worrying about the much more challenging, impactful problem of defense. </p><p>Let's see some good benchmarks here, and have model providers publish their results. </p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/BlueTeam" rel="tag">#<span>BlueTeam</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/d81c06fe-f63d-4801-af2c-d7eb0e555492/everyone-wants-to-know-how-good-ai-is-at-vulnerability-discovery-exploitation-and-running-automated-attacks.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:45:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/d81c06fe-f63d-4801-af2c-d7eb0e555492.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:32:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>