Statistics have a margin of error. Errors can be compounded. A concatenation of trivial snippets based on the probability of them forming a sequence is error compounding, propagation of uncertainty. You end up with a pile of crap. The only thing you can do to mitigate that is using an enormous number of samples to lower the error up to a limit. That's inefficient.

But LLMs are even worse, because they work at token level. Error propagation is greater, so you need even more samples to keep gibberish from happening too often.

Of course, steam drills should probably not make decisions

I got insulted and banned from their Matrix server when I talked about those issues.

Fuck them too, ignorant assholes.

I do not use Microsoft products or services, which means, I do not have any interest in joining their AI infested site, GitHub.

@bryanredeagle @Ciela @gamingonlinux

Although I'm curious, have you tried to report it on github then?

Welcome to the conversation. Thanks for participating.

We've gone over this

Linux Is Best (@Linux@masto.ai)

@bryanredeagle@beige.party 🤣 That status alone, for this long, suggests they don’t monitor their forum. Discourse, the software, has a built-in setting that automatically flags new accounts. This is designed to prevent spam, but it can become a problem if you don’t have a fairly active staff on the site, since the backlog can grow extensively. I’m not a fan of Discourse. Their approach to spam management often acts more as a deterrent to joining and participating. @Ciela@mastodon.ie @gamingonlinux@mastodon.social

Mastodon (masto.ai)

@bryanredeagle @Ciela @gamingonlinux

That status alone, for this long, suggests they don’t monitor their forum.

Discourse, the software, has a built-in setting that automatically flags new accounts. This is designed to prevent spam, but it can become a problem if you don’t have a fairly active staff on the site, since the backlog can grow extensively.

I’m not a fan of Discourse. Their approach to spam management often acts more as a deterrent to joining and participating.

@Ciela @gamingonlinux

That would be too funny.

Actually, Discourse, the software, has a built-in setting that automatically flags new accounts. This is designed to prevent spam, but it can become a problem if you don’t have a fairly active staff on the site, since the backlog can grow extensively.

I’m not a fan of Discourse. Their approach to spam management often acts more as a deterrent to joining and participating. There are better options out there.

@gamingonlinux

FlatHub is starting to remind me of Snap.

I’ve tried reporting a few issues, but no one ever seems to pay any attention.

For example, Hüma Browser was discontinued a years ago, and the URL that FlatHub lists as the project’s homepage now redirects to a phishing site.

I don’t think anyone is monitoring their community forums. My account is still pending approval — Discourse forum software’s classic “you posted too soon after joining” issue.

#FlatHub #SnapD #Linux #OpenSource

> If the project has community engagement, release cadence, CI, and seems to have been more than pure slop produced in 3 weeks, it would be likely exempted. That’s how the bar already was before that commit, and yet, here we are.

I hope this is a temporary solution before a more transparent policy can be developed.

That's rough, I think I read your original post about FP 2.0 prior to any edits.

& Of course I didn't take the time to read the edit to the original post because it wasn't super clear on who made an edit considering I boosted your quoted toot within someone else's post.

Take care & be well.

The main issue I see is that it is a policy that cannot be enforced and therefore becomes hard to actually follow and might end up discouraging those who know what they are doing from submitting.

I don't really have any better suggestions though. This is likely the best we have right now