<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[There is a possible world in which LLMs are good for security: where people vibe-code the 5% of a bloated product&#x2F;library they actually need and avoid a lot of CVEs in the other 95%.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There is a possible world in which LLMs are good for security: where people vibe-code the 5% of a bloated product/library they actually need and avoid a lot of CVEs in the other 95%. Obviously, that won’t happen. (My guess is that products will bloat even more to tip the buy/build scales back to buy).</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/cff3b667-7c92-4f88-82f2-0c2707405dbf/there-is-a-possible-world-in-which-llms-are-good-for-security-where-people-vibe-code-the-5-of-a-bloated-product-library-they-actually-need-and-avoid-a-lot-of-cves-in-the-other-95-.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:54:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/cff3b667-7c92-4f88-82f2-0c2707405dbf.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:17:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>