<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Competition benefits consumers!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Competition benefits consumers! Pretty much everyone used to say <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Anthropic" rel="tag">#<span>Anthropic</span></a> Opus was better, but now I’m starting to see posts saying <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenAI" rel="tag">#<span>OpenAI</span></a> GPT-5.5 is better than (or at least equivalent to) Opus 4.7, except for UI design. Apparently, though, you can now generate UI with GPT-Image-2 and ask Codex to produce code that matches it.<br />Personally, I prefer <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Codex" rel="tag">#<span>Codex</span></a> over <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ClaudeCode" rel="tag">#<span>ClaudeCode</span></a> not because of quality but because Claude’s usage limit really sucks! <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LLM" rel="tag">#<span>LLM</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AI" rel="tag">#<span>AI</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ca706665-32c5-4f58-9079-0591dc4ff913/competition-benefits-consumers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:44:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/ca706665-32c5-4f58-9079-0591dc4ff913.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 16:45:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>