<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I wonder how much Fediverse software would be able to handle an &quot;OrderedCollectionPage&quot; with a &quot;orderedItems&quot; of &quot;Link&quot; IRIs?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much Fediverse software would be able to handle an "OrderedCollectionPage" with a "orderedItems" of "Link" IRIs?</p><p>...</p><p>From the back-end point-of-view it is easier.</p><p>From the front-end point-of-view it is more work.</p><p>From a performance point-of-view, network calls can be costly, so perhaps it is better for the back-end to fetch the data (rather than the client).</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FediDev" rel="tag">#<span>FediDev</span></a></p>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/116/573/504/597/084/481/original/a5df1eb87744eff9.png" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/c7675413-6860-4bec-8f78-b9b3be3e57cf/i-wonder-how-much-fediverse-software-would-be-able-to-handle-an-orderedcollectionpage-with-a-ordereditems-of-link-iris</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:39:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/c7675413-6860-4bec-8f78-b9b3be3e57cf.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:01:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>