<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The RDF &amp;amp; SPARQL Working Group invites implementations of two Candidate Recommendation Snapshots.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The RDF &amp; SPARQL Working Group invites implementations of two Candidate Recommendation Snapshots. </p><p>The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a framework for representing information on the Web. The  RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Data Model defines an abstract data model which serves to link all RDF-based languages and specifications. </p><p>RDF 1.2 Semantics describes a precise semantics for RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Data Model and RDF 1.2 Schema<br /><a href="https://w3c.social/tags/WebStandards" rel="tag">#<span>WebStandards</span></a> <a href="https://w3c.social/tags/RDF" rel="tag">#<span>RDF</span></a><br /><a href="https://www.w3.org/news/2026/w3c-invites-implementations-of-rdf-1-2-concepts-and-abstract-data-model-and-rdf-1-2-semantics/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>w3.org/news/2026/w3c-invites-i</span><span>mplementations-of-rdf-1-2-concepts-and-abstract-data-model-and-rdf-1-2-semantics/</span></a></p>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://w3csocial.files.fedi.monster/media_attachments/files/116/419/913/439/414/346/original/b10e35481515f9e9.png" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/c60af48a-29c2-4577-b2d9-42c9b4d6788a/the-rdf-amp-sparql-working-group-invites-implementations-of-two-candidate-recommendation-snapshots.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 23:25:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/c60af48a-29c2-4577-b2d9-42c9b4d6788a.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:55:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The RDF &amp;amp; SPARQL Working Group invites implementations of two Candidate Recommendation Snapshots. on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:04:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://w3c.social/@w3c/116419913539393552" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>w3c.social/@w3c/11641991353939</span><span>3552</span></a></p><p><span><a href="/user/w3c%40w3c.social">@<span>w3c</span></a></span> I like the idea of simplicity of RDF, and at the same time, I wonder how it seems to become more and more like Topic Maps ( <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic_map" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic_map</span><span></span></a> ).<br />I understand why Topic Maps got out of fashion, yet, what does RDF bring new or different to the table?</p><p>Does anyone know, who can help me here?</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://dice.camp/users/dertseha/statuses/116420424103761689</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://dice.camp/users/dertseha/statuses/116420424103761689</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dertseha@dice.camp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:04:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>