<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This is interesting.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting. As Quants we can distinguish problem classes suited for</p><p>1. causal inference. global macro, CPI, treasury yield, central bank liquidity, game theory crisis resolution models, Q-Learning, SARSA etc.</p><p>2. point in time inference. Signals, Alpha generation<br /><a href="https://www.pitinference.com/#problem" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>pitinference.com/#problem</span><span></span></a> </p><p>I'd think that Point In Time inference has many more use cases besides Alpha generation. </p><p>Because you lose the lookahead bias problem. In general.</p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/model" rel="tag">#<span>model</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/quant" rel="tag">#<span>quant</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/finance" rel="tag">#<span>finance</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/c3269dac-badd-4f39-adce-a90c94a17f14/this-is-interesting.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:53:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/c3269dac-badd-4f39-adce-a90c94a17f14.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:29:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>