<![CDATA[The Supreme Court ruling in Chiles v Salazar held that a Colorado law that prohibited some medical health practitioners from practicing what’s called conversion therapy on minors violates the First Amendment.]]>

<![CDATA[The Supreme Court ruling in Chiles v Salazar held that a Colorado law that prohibited some medical health practitioners from practicing what’s called conversion therapy on minors violates the First Amendment.]]>The Supreme Court ruling in Chiles v Salazar held that a Colorado law that prohibited some medical health practitioners from practicing what’s called conversion therapy on minors violates the First Amendment.

While it seems hard not to take away something disheartening from this ruling from this Court – the New York Times calls it a “major win for conservatives” – CounterSpin's guest this week encourages a focus on ways forward and what is still possible.

Shannon Minter on ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ruling, Alex Frandsen on Local News Day

The Supreme Court ruled that prohibiting the widely discredited practice of trying to “convert” LGBTQ young people violates healthcare workers’ rights.

FAIR (fair.org)

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/bf3da7a2-223a-4d4c-a874-4ebb9d14fc18/the-supreme-court-ruling-in-chiles-v-salazar-held-that-a-colorado-law-that-prohibited-some-medical-health-practitioners-from-practicing-what-s-called-conversion-therapy-on-minors-violates-the-first-amendment.RSS for NodeTue, 07 Apr 2026 01:29:48 GMTFri, 03 Apr 2026 15:00:35 GMT60