<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[New leak about #ChatControl 1.0 by the German @netzpolitik_feed:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>New leak about <a href="https://eupolicy.social/tags/ChatControl" rel="tag">#<span>ChatControl</span></a> 1.0 by the German <span><a href="/user/netzpolitik_feed%40chaos.social">@<span>netzpolitik_feed</span></a></span>:</p><p>Council knew they would make trilogue negotiations fail with their uncompromising approach - and they did so out of political calculation. They feared that reducing the scope in the interim derogation (1.0) would set a precedent for the permanent regulation (Chat Control 2.0).</p><p>The topic remains on the agenda for EP plenary for next week (26 March) and it seems the vote on the EP position could be repeated:<br /><a href="https://netzpolitik.org/2026/verlaengerung-der-ausnahmeregelung-rat-liess-chatkontrolle-verhandlungen-sehenden-auges-scheitern/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>netzpolitik.org/2026/verlaenge</span><span>rung-der-ausnahmeregelung-rat-liess-chatkontrolle-verhandlungen-sehenden-auges-scheitern/</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/bef0e835-8147-4d13-ba1d-dcb016ca60e8/new-leak-about-chatcontrol-1.0-by-the-german-@netzpolitik_feed</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 18:53:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/bef0e835-8147-4d13-ba1d-dcb016ca60e8.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:16:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>