<![CDATA[I'm not super familiar with Red Hat, but can someone do a sanity check for me?]]>

<![CDATA[I'm not super familiar with Red Hat, but can someone do a sanity check for me?]]>I'm not super familiar with Red Hat, but can someone do a sanity check for me? The recommended mitigation for DirtyFrag is to add the relevant modules to a modprobe blocklist. But...I wasn't aware the modules were loaded dynamically? At least on Fedora, they were not.

I very much want to be wrong about this. And expect I am, but want to be sure.

Link Preview Image

RHSB-2026-003 Networking subsystem Privilege Escalation - Linux Kernel (CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-43500, CVE-2026-46300) - Dirty Frag | Red Hat Customer Portal

Access Red Hat’s knowledge, guidance, and support through your subscription.

Red Hat Customer Portal (access.redhat.com)

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/b9aa3242-4158-4398-b8ac-8d42f7a30693/i-m-not-super-familiar-with-red-hat-but-can-someone-do-a-sanity-check-for-meRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 00:37:38 GMTSat, 09 May 2026 02:30:21 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I'm not super familiar with Red Hat, but can someone do a sanity check for me? on Sat, 09 May 2026 02:46:37 GMT]]>@mttaggart
The Red Hat mitigation works fine for protecting both Red Hat and Fedora.

Link Preview Image

Link Preview Image

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/wdormann/statuses/116542327855832491https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/wdormann/statuses/116542327855832491Sat, 09 May 2026 02:46:37 GMT