<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ffs, I’m still hearing “You get what you pay for” as an argument against open source, in 2026.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ffs, I’m still hearing “You get what you pay for” as an argument against open source, in 2026.</p><p>“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” - Upton Sinclair</p><p>I’ve made it a very concious career decision not to base my income on any specific commercial software. I’m not flatly against commercial software, I think there are many legitimate use cases for a this model, but I’d rather bet my career on strong, established open source projects than the commercial whims of some company. I’ve not regretted this so far.</p><p><a href="https://mindly.social/tags/software" rel="tag">#<span>software</span></a> <a href="https://mindly.social/tags/opensource" rel="tag">#<span>opensource</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/b88a1bb9-7ad6-466e-be96-f69261e9ab45/ffs-i-m-still-hearing-you-get-what-you-pay-for-as-an-argument-against-open-source-in-2026.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 03:45:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/b88a1bb9-7ad6-466e-be96-f69261e9ab45.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:53:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>