<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[In our new short letter, we explored where real discussion on complex scientific issues actually happens.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In our new short letter, we explored where real discussion on complex scientific issues actually happens. Instead of articles or reports, we analysed letters to the editor in journals – using <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/geoengineering" rel="tag">#<span>geoengineering</span></a> as a case.</p><p><img class="not-responsive emoji" src="https://static.mstdn.science/custom_emojis/images/000/009/143/original/581a8e7d757b39a1.png" title=":doi:" /> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0161" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0161</span><span></span></a></p><p>These short texts turn out to be one of the few spaces where science becomes a dialogue: not only experts, but also broader publics engage, and discussions move beyond technical details to <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/ethics" rel="tag">#<span>ethics</span></a> risks, and governance.</p><p><a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/OpenScience" rel="tag">#<span>OpenScience</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/SciComm" rel="tag">#<span>SciComm</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/9aa3c42a-2ce9-42fe-860e-8e2e2201533d/in-our-new-short-letter-we-explored-where-real-discussion-on-complex-scientific-issues-actually-happens.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:16:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/9aa3c42a-2ce9-42fe-860e-8e2e2201533d.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:22:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>