<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Nothing is really &#x27;wrong&#x27; with neoFetch.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Nothing is really 'wrong' with neoFetch. <br /><br />The author of that software announced he was no longer working on it and pretty much disappeared. It works, but may not recognize distros that are newcomers and weren't programmed into the last release of neoFetch. <br /><br />I do prefer fastFetch, as it is written in C, is slimmer and does, well... seem to be faster. <br /><br />Debian Trixie has fastFetch instead of NeoFetch, for example. <br /><br /><a href="https://social.retroedge.tech/tag/neofetch" rel="tag ugc">#neoFetch</a> <a href="https://social.retroedge.tech/tag/fastfetch" rel="tag ugc">#fastFetch</a>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/923497cb-98a1-485c-8ae3-28e77ac4ea70/nothing-is-really-wrong-with-neofetch.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 23:35:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/923497cb-98a1-485c-8ae3-28e77ac4ea70.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 20:37:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>