<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Intego ONE Review: Strong Mac Protection, But Missing Key Features]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Intego ONE Review: Strong Mac Protection, But Missing Key Features</p><p>Intego ONE is lab-certified to protect against macOS malware and includes a personal firewall, but we'd like to see it add web protection like that found in most competitors.</p><p><a href="https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/intego-one" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>pcmag.com/reviews/intego-one</span><span></span></a></p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/intego" rel="tag">#<span>intego</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/pcmag" rel="tag">#<span>pcmag</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/antivirus" rel="tag">#<span>antivirus</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/macantivirus" rel="tag">#<span>macantivirus</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/869d3374-ca2e-49fd-9eaf-9cba73664e80/intego-one-review-strong-mac-protection-but-missing-key-features</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:35:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/869d3374-ca2e-49fd-9eaf-9cba73664e80.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:46:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>