<![CDATA[Every time I cover E2E verifiable voting in my election technology course, I talk myself out of the idea a little bit more.]]>Every time I cover E2E verifiable voting in my election technology course, I talk myself out of the idea a little bit more. Very neat in principle, but I think inherently vulnerable in practice to disinformation, at least until more intuitive and simpler schemes are developed.

(E2E verifiable voting uses a lot of fancy cryptography to allow voters and the public to confirm that votes were counted correctly without revealing how any individual voted)

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/7d9dcc36-4059-4ef1-b28e-9f83c638006d/every-time-i-cover-e2e-verifiable-voting-in-my-election-technology-course-i-talk-myself-out-of-the-idea-a-little-bit-more.RSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 02:31:41 GMTThu, 16 Apr 2026 19:55:16 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Every time I cover E2E verifiable voting in my election technology course, I talk myself out of the idea a little bit more. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:01:35 GMT]]>@mattblaze
> Very neat in principle, but I think inherently vulnerable in practice to disinformation, at least until more intuitive and simpler schemes are developed.

The constitutional court of Germany banned any form electronic voting in public elections here on this argument by the way.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/varbin/statuses/116416164346535457https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/varbin/statuses/116416164346535457Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:01:35 GMT