Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Trump and the Supreme Court of the United States thread đź§µ

Trump and the Supreme Court of the United States thread đź§µ

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
14 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jmcrookston@mastodon.social
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Trump and the Supreme Court of the United States thread đź§µ

    Because Trump shook hands with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and said "Thank you again. Thank you again. Won’t forget,"

    I want to know what Trump's people say to the Supreme Court justices in private.

    Because eventually it's going to be a threat.

    Same with representatives and senators.

    (Edited to add exact quote from an article a few posts down.)

    jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

      Trump and the Supreme Court of the United States thread đź§µ

      Because Trump shook hands with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and said "Thank you again. Thank you again. Won’t forget,"

      I want to know what Trump's people say to the Supreme Court justices in private.

      Because eventually it's going to be a threat.

      Same with representatives and senators.

      (Edited to add exact quote from an article a few posts down.)

      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmcrookston@mastodon.social
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      To be clear, we already know they're being bribed, because that's out in the open.

      We also already know house reps are scared of contradicting Trump because their families get threatened.

      I wonder how long it'll be before the first person says they've actually been physically threatened.

      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

        To be clear, we already know they're being bribed, because that's out in the open.

        We also already know house reps are scared of contradicting Trump because their families get threatened.

        I wonder how long it'll be before the first person says they've actually been physically threatened.

        jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jmcrookston@mastodon.social
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        We need only recall what Liz Cheney had to endure to appreciate that they are already making implicit direct threats, and they've been making stochastic ones for a while.

        I imagine they're busy threatening everybody (or many) in the background already, directly.

        "I'd hate to see your family come to any harm. Just sayin'"

        jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

          We need only recall what Liz Cheney had to endure to appreciate that they are already making implicit direct threats, and they've been making stochastic ones for a while.

          I imagine they're busy threatening everybody (or many) in the background already, directly.

          "I'd hate to see your family come to any harm. Just sayin'"

          jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jmcrookston@mastodon.social
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          "I'd hate to see some of the stuff we know you're involved with come to light and hit the news.

          If you know what I'm saying."

          jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

            "I'd hate to see some of the stuff we know you're involved with come to light and hit the news.

            If you know what I'm saying."

            jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jmcrookston@mastodon.social
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            We already know the president is transactional about everything so his comment to Roberts is definitely transactional as well. He's saying he will reward Roberts.

            jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

              We already know the president is transactional about everything so his comment to Roberts is definitely transactional as well. He's saying he will reward Roberts.

              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmcrookston@mastodon.social
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It's not so cryptic. It's actually pretty obvious. It's actually pretty stupid to say out loud in front of other people. Yeah, I'd say it's the opposite of cryptic. Definitely the opposite.

              Donald Trump Cryptically Thanks Chief Justice John Roberts with Pat on the Shoulder, Then Says He 'Won't Forget' https://people.com/trump-thanks-chief-justice-john-roberts-wont-forget-11691339

              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                It's not so cryptic. It's actually pretty obvious. It's actually pretty stupid to say out loud in front of other people. Yeah, I'd say it's the opposite of cryptic. Definitely the opposite.

                Donald Trump Cryptically Thanks Chief Justice John Roberts with Pat on the Shoulder, Then Says He 'Won't Forget' https://people.com/trump-thanks-chief-justice-john-roberts-wont-forget-11691339

                jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                The Supreme Court just blocked the lower Court ruling to provide SNAP benefits to those who need it.

                The Supreme Court has no legitimacy.

                Edit: found a written report. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/supreme-court-pauses-order-for-trump-administration-to-pay-full-snap-benefits-aff37071?st=jz8MrZ

                If this turns out to be an extremely short stay pending the appeals court weighing in, then it is what it is, but they could have justified not doing so in the case and that they did not, is disappointing

                jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                  The Supreme Court just blocked the lower Court ruling to provide SNAP benefits to those who need it.

                  The Supreme Court has no legitimacy.

                  Edit: found a written report. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/supreme-court-pauses-order-for-trump-administration-to-pay-full-snap-benefits-aff37071?st=jz8MrZ

                  If this turns out to be an extremely short stay pending the appeals court weighing in, then it is what it is, but they could have justified not doing so in the case and that they did not, is disappointing

                  jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  It was a short stay because the appeal court was going to rule on the matter. It has now ruled on the matter and upheld the lower court order to distribute the money.

                  Note that because the Supreme Court stated even for the one day, some states stopped distributing the money. Good job.

                  https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-administration-renews-supreme-court-appeal-to-keep-full-snap-payments-frozen

                  jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                    It was a short stay because the appeal court was going to rule on the matter. It has now ruled on the matter and upheld the lower court order to distribute the money.

                    Note that because the Supreme Court stated even for the one day, some states stopped distributing the money. Good job.

                    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-administration-renews-supreme-court-appeal-to-keep-full-snap-payments-frozen

                    jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Trump is now appealing that decision to the Supreme Court because he does not want to give people in need any money at all because he is a heinous horrible crook. The Republican party is complicit. None of this is in the best interests of the country.

                    The Republican party and Trump need to go to jail for the rest of their natural lives for abdicating their role in the political system, and treason.

                    jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                      Trump is now appealing that decision to the Supreme Court because he does not want to give people in need any money at all because he is a heinous horrible crook. The Republican party is complicit. None of this is in the best interests of the country.

                      The Republican party and Trump need to go to jail for the rest of their natural lives for abdicating their role in the political system, and treason.

                      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      "Some states acted quickly to direct their EBT vendors to disburse full monthly benefits to SNAP recipients. Millions of people in at least a dozen states — all with Democratic governors — received the full amount to buy groceries before Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson put McConnell’s order on hold Friday night, pending further deliberation by an appeals court."

                      From article above.

                      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                        "Some states acted quickly to direct their EBT vendors to disburse full monthly benefits to SNAP recipients. Millions of people in at least a dozen states — all with Democratic governors — received the full amount to buy groceries before Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson put McConnell’s order on hold Friday night, pending further deliberation by an appeals court."

                        From article above.

                        jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        https://www.rev.com/transcripts/supreme-court-justice-secretly-recorded

                        "Alito asked by Windsor about a nation divided between left and right, saying “One side or the other is going to win. There can be a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised”.

                        After Windsor said the country needs to return to a place of godliness, Alito responding “I agree”.

                        The conversation recorded during the Supreme Court historical Society’s annual dinner, June 3rd,"

                        jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                          https://www.rev.com/transcripts/supreme-court-justice-secretly-recorded

                          "Alito asked by Windsor about a nation divided between left and right, saying “One side or the other is going to win. There can be a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised”.

                          After Windsor said the country needs to return to a place of godliness, Alito responding “I agree”.

                          The conversation recorded during the Supreme Court historical Society’s annual dinner, June 3rd,"

                          jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          (01:03)
                          Alito had responded that his wife, Martha-Ann, raised the flags. She was also recorded by Windsor who told her she was being persecuted. Mrs. Alito responding, “I’m German from I’m German. My heritage is German. You come after me, I’m going to give it back to you”. And discussing other flags she wanted to fly at their house. “You know what I want? I want a sacred heart of Jesus flag because I have to look across the lagoon at the pride flag for the next month”.

                          jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                            (01:03)
                            Alito had responded that his wife, Martha-Ann, raised the flags. She was also recorded by Windsor who told her she was being persecuted. Mrs. Alito responding, “I’m German from I’m German. My heritage is German. You come after me, I’m going to give it back to you”. And discussing other flags she wanted to fly at their house. “You know what I want? I want a sacred heart of Jesus flag because I have to look across the lagoon at the pride flag for the next month”.

                            jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            "(01:52)
                            “I don’t know that we live in a Christian nation. I know a lot of Jewish and Muslim friends who would say maybe not, and it’s not our job to do that”. The court has not responded to a request for comment but the historical society, which hosted the event where the recordings were made, says in a statement they condemn the surreptitious recording of justices there, which they say is inconsistent with the spirit of the evening."

                            Bribes are also against the spirit of justice bub.

                            jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                              "(01:52)
                              “I don’t know that we live in a Christian nation. I know a lot of Jewish and Muslim friends who would say maybe not, and it’s not our job to do that”. The court has not responded to a request for comment but the historical society, which hosted the event where the recordings were made, says in a statement they condemn the surreptitious recording of justices there, which they say is inconsistent with the spirit of the evening."

                              Bribes are also against the spirit of justice bub.

                              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and the bought and paid for Supreme Court of the United States thread đź§µ

                              https://mastodon.social/@jmcrookston/110783450769904934

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups