<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Sweet!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sweet! The Microsoft anti-SSRF library is now open source: <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/antissrf" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>github.com/microsoft/antissrf</span><span></span></a></p><p>This has been a core defense for SSRF at Microsoft for a time now. It's insane how complicated the topic really is.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/715a3508-d5da-423d-84c0-ab0bc7682af6/sweet</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 04:44:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/715a3508-d5da-423d-84c0-ab0bc7682af6.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:05:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sweet! on Thu, 07 May 2026 16:23:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, don't go it alone. Look at these unit tests. SSRF defense is hard!</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/Lee_Holmes/statuses/116534216094104527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/Lee_Holmes/statuses/116534216094104527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lee_holmes@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:23:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>