<![CDATA[Linux is NOT secure.]]>Linux is NOT secure. The average Linux distro is garbage. Latest dirty frag shit proved my point too. GrapheneOS and probably (not sure) secureblue didn't get affected by this.

Use secureblue GNOME or nothing.

@secureblue.dev

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/6b25553c-b805-479d-83a9-4543d5d66a65/linux-is-not-secure.RSS for NodeFri, 05 Jun 2026 00:36:13 GMTSat, 23 May 2026 23:04:57 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Linux is NOT secure. on Tue, 26 May 2026 03:06:24 GMT]]>@anonleftist Use a search engine to see if Ubuntu comes with a firewall. (Hopefully you find UFW)

You can't expect an operating system to come with a completely pre-configured firewall for every use case.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/116590760552038843/statuses/116638664919007152https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/116590760552038843/statuses/116638664919007152Tue, 26 May 2026 03:06:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Linux is NOT secure. on Tue, 26 May 2026 01:32:45 GMT]]>@return0media they don't even come with a hardened firewall...

Ubuntu doesn't even have a firewall for example.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.plus/ap/users/116626162513039657/statuses/116638296685748104https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.plus/ap/users/116626162513039657/statuses/116638296685748104Tue, 26 May 2026 01:32:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Linux is NOT secure. on Tue, 26 May 2026 01:24:35 GMT]]>@anonleftist sure, the distro you mentioned has hardening against the suid-root exploitation path but your generalization doesn't neccesarily follow.

Also the assumption that other distros have zero hardening is also verifiably untrue.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/116590760552038843/statuses/116638264537851141https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/116590760552038843/statuses/116638264537851141Tue, 26 May 2026 01:24:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Linux is NOT secure. on Tue, 26 May 2026 01:18:21 GMT]]>@return0media what are you talking about?

Thanks to hardening they didn't get affected by that. Other distros have ZERO hardening.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.plus/ap/users/116626162513039657/statuses/116638240041720631https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.plus/ap/users/116626162513039657/statuses/116638240041720631Tue, 26 May 2026 01:18:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Linux is NOT secure. on Tue, 26 May 2026 01:13:36 GMT]]>@anonleftist I don't think generalizing based on one CVE is a great way to think about security.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/116590760552038843/statuses/116638221360869544https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/116590760552038843/statuses/116638221360869544Tue, 26 May 2026 01:13:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Linux is NOT secure. on Sun, 24 May 2026 18:23:19 GMT]]>@simondeutschl dirty frag didn't affect GOS for example thanks to hardening.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.plus/ap/users/116626162513039657/statuses/116630945739944546https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.plus/ap/users/116626162513039657/statuses/116630945739944546Sun, 24 May 2026 18:23:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Linux is NOT secure. on Sun, 24 May 2026 15:23:42 GMT]]>@anonleftist
Yeah. I'm sure, Secureblue and GrapheneOS are completely safe from critical security issues ... 🙄

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://troet.cafe/users/simondeutschl/statuses/116630239458761171https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://troet.cafe/users/simondeutschl/statuses/116630239458761171Sun, 24 May 2026 15:23:42 GMT