<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Is #Ruby the new #Perl?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Is <a href="https://meow.social/tags/Ruby" rel="tag">#<span>Ruby</span></a> the new <a href="https://meow.social/tags/Perl" rel="tag">#<span>Perl</span></a>?</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/643bc7e6-375d-48ad-abd9-dea58c015ab7/is-ruby-the-new-perl</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:42:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/643bc7e6-375d-48ad-abd9-dea58c015ab7.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:37:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is #Ruby the new #Perl? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:35:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/catdraoichta%40meow.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>catdraoichta</span></a></span> Depends on how far you zoom out. From a Haskell POV, Python looks a lot like Perl. But then, neither Ruby nor Python are what I'd call new.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/barubary/statuses/116478110947498223</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/barubary/statuses/116478110947498223</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[barubary@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:35:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>