<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does anyone know of a cloud provider who offers very cheap rates (i.e. lower than Hetzner) in exchange for extremely low uptime, e.g. &amp;lt;50%?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know of a cloud provider who offers very cheap rates (i.e. lower than Hetzner) in exchange for extremely low uptime, e.g. &lt;50%?</p><p>In times of solar it seems it would make sense to just keep old(ish) servers connected and only power them up when electricity is free (or negative even).</p><p>I have a compute workload which I expect to complete in ~150days(!); if I could get cheap compute anywhen before that, I'd pay for it. [And I expect to have future workloads which can be delayed 2 days without much trouble.]</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/596fd106-fb8c-4c69-a78d-cd13932722c4/does-anyone-know-of-a-cloud-provider-who-offers-very-cheap-rates-i.e.-lower-than-hetzner-in-exchange-for-extremely-low-uptime-e.g.-lt-50</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 08:26:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/596fd106-fb8c-4c69-a78d-cd13932722c4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 22:32:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone know of a cloud provider who offers very cheap rates (i.e. lower than Hetzner) in exchange for extremely low uptime, e.g. &amp;lt;50%? on Wed, 06 May 2026 20:11:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/txt_file%40chaos.social">@<span>txt_file</span></a></span> In my case, each chunk is: 2-60 minutes (80% &lt; 15minutes), 1 cpu core, &lt;8GB RAM. Random crashes are fine (any ongoing chunks of work would have to be restarted).</p><p>I think many SaaS companies have such tasks (if only they looked). E.g. cassandra compactions could be done this way (with a bit of patching, though).</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/drahflow/statuses/116529448742112989</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/drahflow/statuses/116529448742112989</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[drahflow@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 20:11:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone know of a cloud provider who offers very cheap rates (i.e. lower than Hetzner) in exchange for extremely low uptime, e.g. &amp;lt;50%? on Wed, 06 May 2026 17:46:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/drahflow%40infosec.exchange">@<span>drahflow</span></a></span> how big are the computational chunks (CPU time, system memory, …)</p><p>As I understand you have to compute the task in junks/parts as the computing computer might turn off at any time.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://chaos.social/users/txt_file/statuses/116528880634643545</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://chaos.social/users/txt_file/statuses/116528880634643545</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[txt_file@chaos.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 17:46:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>