<![CDATA[I'm considering moving TLS Inspector's source code off of GitHub.]]>I'm considering moving TLS Inspector's source code off of GitHub. What are your thoughts?

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/554dbe26-7466-42e9-806b-0c09962c4a00/i-m-considering-moving-tls-inspector-s-source-code-off-of-github.RSS for NodeFri, 10 Apr 2026 19:16:29 GMTSat, 28 Mar 2026 23:00:17 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I'm considering moving TLS Inspector's source code off of GitHub. on Sat, 28 Mar 2026 23:25:12 GMT]]>@tlsinspector what are your reasons for moving? codeberg has visibility but notorious for being a DDOS target. Do you WANT to maintain your own forge? Do you care the actions scene is much less developed?

i hosted my own forge for a year and a half (forgejo) and i missed out on a lot and had to update frequently. i loved it for what it was but you should only EXPECT git remotely. Anything beyond that is a blessing.

Codeberg is where you want if you want to be somewhat discoverable and don’t care of the remote is down from time to time. They haven’t had any data loss in the time they’ve been in operation that i’m aware of.

So, what’s YOUR reason? 😊

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/jahanson/statuses/116309381104166497https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/jahanson/statuses/116309381104166497Sat, 28 Mar 2026 23:25:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I'm considering moving TLS Inspector's source code off of GitHub. on Sat, 28 Mar 2026 23:02:07 GMT]]>@tlsinspector do you care about self hosting or nah

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.treehouse.systems/users/kouhai/statuses/116309290330264693https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.treehouse.systems/users/kouhai/statuses/116309290330264693Sat, 28 Mar 2026 23:02:07 GMT