<![CDATA[New reason to run #Forgejo.]]>New reason to run . You'll almost certainly have better uptime than .

I guess there's technically one nine in that uptime, but not in the decimal position you'd want it to be in.

Link Preview Image
]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/5511abab-0fe2-437c-aa76-a1baed02c76f/new-reason-to-run-forgejo.RSS for NodeFri, 17 Apr 2026 02:38:27 GMTTue, 07 Apr 2026 17:44:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to New reason to run #Forgejo. on Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:07:05 GMT]]>@vwbusguy

for anyone wondering: thats the source:
https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://bahn.social/users/haennes/statuses/116364753313557509https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://bahn.social/users/haennes/statuses/116364753313557509Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:07:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New reason to run #Forgejo. on Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:50:05 GMT]]>@vwbusguy@mastodon.online
> Last 90 days uptime
> 94 incidents in the last 90 days
> 89.43% uptime
> 90 days ago

wdm, it's totally five nines.]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/nothacking/statuses/116364686474625577https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/nothacking/statuses/116364686474625577Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:50:05 GMT