<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[i would rather download an exe and run it under wine than install a flatpak]]></title><description><![CDATA[i would rather download an exe and run it under wine than install a flatpak]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/53d93451-9867-4197-a105-018d78b7a515/i-would-rather-download-an-exe-and-run-it-under-wine-than-install-a-flatpak</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:35:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/53d93451-9867-4197-a105-018d78b7a515.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 19:41:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to i would rather download an exe and run it under wine than install a flatpak on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:31:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/lizzy%40social.vlhl.dev" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>lizzy</span></a></span> both snap and flatpak fail, often in very unclear ways, somewhere in integration.</p><p>I’m currently using Appimage where I must and can. And hoping/waiting for ports where I can’t.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/avuko/statuses/116416518640569658</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/avuko/statuses/116416518640569658</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[avuko@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:31:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>