<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Rise of #Emotional #Surveillance - The Atlantic]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Rise of <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Emotional" rel="tag">#<span>Emotional</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Surveillance" rel="tag">#<span>Surveillance</span></a> - The Atlantic</p><p>According to an app called <a href="https://mas.to/tags/MorphCast" rel="tag">#<span>MorphCast</span></a> , I was, in a recent meeting with my boss, generally “amused,” “determined,” &amp; “interested,” though—sue me—occasionally “impatient.” MorphCast, you see, purports to glean insights into the depths &amp; vagaries of human <a href="https://mas.to/tags/emotion" rel="tag">#<span>emotion</span></a> using <a href="https://mas.to/tags/AI" rel="tag">#<span>AI</span></a>. It found that my affect was “positive” &amp; “active,” as opposed to negative and/or passive. My attention was reasonably high.<br /><a href="https://mas.to/tags/privacy" rel="tag">#<span>privacy</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/surveillance" rel="tag">#<span>surveillance</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/2026/05/worker-surveillance-emotion-ai/687029/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>theatlantic.com/culture/2026/0</span><span>5/worker-surveillance-emotion-ai/687029/</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/49227a23-dee6-48a2-a4e7-d52e29c42059/the-rise-of-emotional-surveillance-the-atlantic</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:40:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/49227a23-dee6-48a2-a4e7-d52e29c42059.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 03:19:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>