<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Yesterday’s side‑by‑side release of #GPT‑5.5 and #deepseekv4 is interesting, but not for the usual “is this a leap?” debate]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday’s side‑by‑side release of <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/GPT" rel="tag">#<span>GPT</span></a>‑5.5 and <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/deepseekv4" rel="tag">#<span>deepseekv4</span></a>  is interesting, but not for the usual “is this a leap?” debate.<br />What stands out is that DeepSeek continues to operate near this tier at all, given the hardware and compute constraints they’re clearly optimizing against. That’s not luck; it’s a sustained signal about where leverage actually lives and the biggest battle in the industry. </p><p>🧵1/4</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/41982669-52af-476c-8143-af3663fb02f5/yesterday-s-side-by-side-release-of-gpt-5.5-and-deepseekv4-is-interesting-but-not-for-the-usual-is-this-a-leap-debate</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 04:23:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/41982669-52af-476c-8143-af3663fb02f5.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:21:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>