If I set up Trainseller.com and manage to get a license to sell DB and OBB tickets, and bundle them together… The various scanning machines that all the companies use still need to be updated with Trainseller.com’s signing certificate, or my certificate needs signing by the various operators individually, and that be bundled on the ticket… What is your proposal to make that viable?

(And of course, you need to deal with revocations and the like)

You've made two attempts at this famous for being a pain to deal with.

How do you solve this at a European scale, when there could be thousands of resellers that need certificates managing?

"Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated."

Interesting that Madrid-Rome is top 1 (of international routes). When high-speed rail tunnel through the Mediterranean? A good one for @jon 's #BullshitMeter

i only have the codes i was given but a join would be trivial (i was considering making a map before my stomach reminded me that i hadn't had lunch yet)

@cycling_on_rails @redjives

i started with duckdb because people always tell me it is good and i want to understand why. then as usual i went back to clickhouse-local when basic features like `limit by` were missing

biggest_aviation/readme.md at master · bovine3dom/biggest_aviation

wrangle eurostat data to get biggest cross-border aviation routes - biggest_aviation/readme.md at master · bovine3dom/biggest_aviation

GitHub (github.com)

And if you have them, IATA codes would be nicer than ICAO codes.

@cycling_on_rails

maybe the eurostat package makes it nicer but for me the worst bit was downloading the data

yes

it took me like an hour to wrangle and grok it so i don't think i was being too rude when i said it was probably beyond T&E

This thread is super interesting. I’ll have to re-read, catch up on the project and think about this.

It would be interesting if the bundling solution was executed through the barcode, but my hunch would be that a signed barcode, if a formal process is necessary, would not be enough and a separate process would also be introduced. Approval to bundle could also get interesting.

@bovine3dom @jon @HRCH

or they could trust Zügli

@stefanlindbohm @jon @HRCH

i would love to be wrong

@q @stefanlindbohm @HRCH

is there a very good reason for it? what are the limitations of "the barcode is a dumb container" approach?

@stefanlindbohm @jon @HRCH