<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[File under: AI Resistance]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>File under: AI Resistance</p><p>I'm reading – and enjoying immensely – <span><a href="/user/emilymbender%40dair-community.social" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener">@<span>emilymbender</span></a></span> and <span><a href="/user/alex%40dair-community.social" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener">@<span>alex</span></a></span>'s book <a href="https://aseachange.com/tags/theaicon" rel="tag nofollow noreferrer noopener">#<span>TheAICon</span></a>.</p><p>I've been learning a lot of things and something that really stood out recently is the need to be careful about the language we use to describe these systems. Bender and Hanna helpfully explain:</p><p>"It matters what words we use when we talk about these technologies. For instance, in our writing, we don’t use the term “hallucination” to discuss the errors of LLMs, for two reasons. First, if it’s used tongue-in-cheek, it is making light of what can be symptoms of serious mental illness. Second,<br />“hallucination” refers to the experience of perceiving things that aren’t there. But LLMs actually don’t have perceptions, and suggesting that they do is yet more unhelpful anthropomorphization. That means we also avoid assigning thought processes to these systems, or saying that they can<br />“think”. Metaphors have power, they structure the frames of discourse, and they can subtly and insidiously encourage certain ways of understanding technology and the social systems it is embedded in."</p><p>Antropomorphizing AI contributes to AI hype. Thanks Emily and Alex for helping me see things this way!</p><p><a href="https://aseachange.com/tags/aicritique" rel="tag nofollow noreferrer noopener">#<span>AIcritique</span></a> <a href="https://aseachange.com/tags/aihype" rel="tag nofollow noreferrer noopener">#<span>AIhype</span></a> <a href="https://aseachange.com/tags/noai" rel="tag nofollow noreferrer noopener">#<span>NoAI</span></a> <a href="https://aseachange.com/tags/airesistance" rel="tag nofollow noreferrer noopener">#<span>AIresistance</span></a> <a href="https://aseachange.com/tags/ai" rel="tag nofollow noreferrer noopener">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://aseachange.com/tags/books" rel="tag nofollow noreferrer noopener">#<span>books</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/389002af-ab52-45f6-bd12-7c5de705b38d/file-under-ai-resistance</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:38:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/389002af-ab52-45f6-bd12-7c5de705b38d.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 07:50:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to File under: AI Resistance on Thu, 21 May 2026 14:06:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/elena%40aseachange.com">@<span>elena</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/emilymbender%40dair-community.social">@<span>emilymbender</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/alex%40dair-community.social">@<span>alex</span></a></span> Thanks for that review and excerpt!</p><p>The words used for this technology has bugged me since it became a thing. Starting with the fact that it is not AI, it's not intelligence. I hadn't even gotten into the other words being used, and I have a lot of respect that they are digging into that.</p><p>I may have to pick up this book, and I don't read much non-fiction.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://vmst.io/users/mlippert/statuses/116612950082980634</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://vmst.io/users/mlippert/statuses/116612950082980634</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mlippert@vmst.io]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:06:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to File under: AI Resistance on Thu, 21 May 2026 10:56:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/eobet%40oldbytes.space">@<span>eobet</span></a></span> I think it depends a lot on the context: what actually even fits? I'll give e.g. "hallucinate" that; it's easy to work in. Sometimes I suppose simply "incorrect" fits the bill, especially if the aim is to describe a property of the output.</p><p>IMO not everything necessarily requires a single word.</p><p><span><a href="/user/rpbook%40gts.phillipsuk.org">@<span>rpbook</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/elena%40aseachange.com">@<span>elena</span></a></span></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.mkj.earth/users/mkj/statuses/116612200283217907</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.mkj.earth/users/mkj/statuses/116612200283217907</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mkj@social.mkj.earth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 10:56:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to File under: AI Resistance on Thu, 21 May 2026 10:50:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/mkj%40social.mkj.earth" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>mkj</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/rpbook%40gts.phillipsuk.org" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>rpbook</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/emilymbender%40dair-community.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>emilymbender</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/alex%40dair-community.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>alex</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/elena%40aseachange.com" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>elena</span></a></span> I'm also interested in what alternative terminology should be used... "error prone output" seems appropriate but perhaps a bit long?</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://oldbytes.space/users/eobet/statuses/116612179839397508</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://oldbytes.space/users/eobet/statuses/116612179839397508</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[eobet@oldbytes.space]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 10:50:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to File under: AI Resistance on Thu, 21 May 2026 08:40:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/rpbook%40gts.phillipsuk.org">@<span>rpbook</span></a></span> I obviously can't speak for <span><a href="/user/emilymbender%40dair-community.social">@<span>emilymbender</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/alex%40dair-community.social">@<span>alex</span></a></span> but personally I try to use terms like "model creation" in lieu of "training"; "output" instead of "answer" or "response"; etc. Also pointing out that so-called "hallucinations" in generative AI is simply how they are designed to work. See <a href="https://michael.kjorling.se/ai/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>michael.kjorling.se/ai/</span><span></span></a> for how this can work out in practice.</p><p><span><a href="/user/elena%40aseachange.com">@<span>elena</span></a></span></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.mkj.earth/users/mkj/statuses/116611666389075357</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.mkj.earth/users/mkj/statuses/116611666389075357</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mkj@social.mkj.earth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:40:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to File under: AI Resistance on Thu, 21 May 2026 08:07:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/elena%40aseachange.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener">@<span>elena</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/emilymbender%40dair-community.social" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener">@<span>emilymbender</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/alex%40dair-community.social" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener">@<span>alex</span></a></span> do they suggest an alternative term to use?</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://gts.phillipsuk.org/users/rpbook/statuses/01KS4S5VQC896AAJGQY2GKAZ66</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://gts.phillipsuk.org/users/rpbook/statuses/01KS4S5VQC896AAJGQY2GKAZ66</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rpbook@gts.phillipsuk.org]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:07:06 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>