<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Now that we are openly challenging technical status quo around gems, I feel that I can openly share my dream:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Now that we are openly challenging technical status quo around gems, I feel that I can openly share my dream:</p><p>gem 'foobar', '&gt;~ 1.0', flags: [:activerecord, :rspec, :phlex]</p><p>... which would set up integration with other gems, make them dependencies if needed etc.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/32977f9a-22df-4667-88bf-a783e1ad6c4b/now-that-we-are-openly-challenging-technical-status-quo-around-gems-i-feel-that-i-can-openly-share-my-dream</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 02:12:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/32977f9a-22df-4667-88bf-a783e1ad6c4b.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:21:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Now that we are openly challenging technical status quo around gems, I feel that I can openly share my dream: on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:49:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://ruby.social/@katafrakt" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>katafrakt</span></a></span> Rubygems should adopt Gentoo Package Manager Specification <a href="https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Manager_Specification" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_M</span><span>anager_Specification</span></a></p><p>At least the names and versions section of it.</p>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://status-assets.pointless.one/media_attachments/files/116/473/210/213/240/325/original/e88837189dcbf277.png" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://status.pointless.one/users/pointlessone/statuses/116473210450595130</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://status.pointless.one/users/pointlessone/statuses/116473210450595130</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pointlessone@status.pointless.one]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:49:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Now that we are openly challenging technical status quo around gems, I feel that I can openly share my dream: on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:54:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Main use case I would see:</p><p>- selecting HTTP adapter, so you don't end up with 12 different in the project<br />- choosing markdown renderer<br />- using nokolexbor instead of nokogiri</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/katafrakt/statuses/116472525561212612</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/katafrakt/statuses/116472525561212612</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[katafrakt@ruby.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:54:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Now that we are openly challenging technical status quo around gems, I feel that I can openly share my dream: on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:52:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/ahx%40ruby.social">@<span>ahx</span></a></span> yes. Perhaps RSpec is a bit exotic, but thinking about ActiveRecord, it could:</p><p>- set minimal supported AR version as a dependency<br />- load AR extensions<br />- even if the project has Sequel in deps, does not load Sequel extensions</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/katafrakt/statuses/116472517612243782</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/katafrakt/statuses/116472517612243782</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[katafrakt@ruby.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:52:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Now that we are openly challenging technical status quo around gems, I feel that I can openly share my dream: on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:44:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://ruby.social/@katafrakt">@<span>katafrakt</span></a></span> I don’t understand. Does this load  the rspec integration of the foobar <br />gem?</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/ahx/statuses/116472483074156434</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/ahx/statuses/116472483074156434</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahx@ruby.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:44:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Now that we are openly challenging technical status quo around gems, I feel that I can openly share my dream: on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:23:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Of course, this does not have to be limited to other gems integration, might be also used to turn off some unneeded features (with their dependencies).</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/katafrakt/statuses/116472403508214431</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://ruby.social/users/katafrakt/statuses/116472403508214431</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[katafrakt@ruby.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 18:23:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>