<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[FEP-8b32 (Object Integrity Proofs) is getting updated: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;codeberg.org&#x2F;fediverse&#x2F;fep&#x2F;pulls&#x2F;839]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>FEP-8b32 (Object Integrity Proofs) is getting updated: <a href="https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/839" rel="noopener">https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/839</a></p><p>I added two new requirements:</p><p>- Objects identified using fragment IDs SHOULD NOT have integrity proofs. It is enough to secure the top-level document.<br />- Verifiers SHOULD ignore proofs that use unsupported algorithms and verification methods. This requirement provides forward compatibility, which is important because sooner or later we will need to use different algorithms.</p><p><a href="https://mitra.social/collections/tags/fep_8b32" rel="tag noopener">#fep_8b32</a> <a href="https://mitra.social/collections/tags/fep" rel="tag noopener">#fep</a> <a href="https://mitra.social/collections/tags/fedidev" rel="tag noopener">#fedidev</a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/303c8633-c838-4bb0-b568-afb989f13351/fep-8b32-object-integrity-proofs-is-getting-updated-https-codeberg.org-fediverse-fep-pulls-839</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:01:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/303c8633-c838-4bb0-b568-afb989f13351.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 09:08:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>