<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[What a bad day for #Ubuntu to be down and under attack, especially with everyone looking for details on copy.fail and cPanel.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What a bad day for <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Ubuntu" rel="tag">#<span>Ubuntu</span></a> to be down and under attack, especially with everyone looking for details on copy.fail and cPanel.</p><p>Since people chasing down info on them keep running into Ubuntu issues, they seem to be under active attack:<br /><a href="https://www.theregister.com/2026/05/01/canonical_confirms_ubuntu_infrastructure_under/?td=rt-3a" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>theregister.com/2026/05/01/can</span><span>onical_confirms_ubuntu_infrastructure_under/?td=rt-3a</span></a></p><p>They are now returning localhost addresses for www.ubuntu.com:</p><p>$ host www.ubuntu.com<br />www.ubuntu.com has address 127.0.0.1<br />www.ubuntu.com has IPv6 address ::1</p><p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/ubuntu" rel="tag">#<span>ubuntu</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/DDoS" rel="tag">#<span>DDoS</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/infosec" rel="tag">#<span>infosec</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/2f252955-e410-4d61-bd7e-2cc60ecfe44d/what-a-bad-day-for-ubuntu-to-be-down-and-under-attack-especially-with-everyone-looking-for-details-on-copy.fail-and-cpanel.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:44:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/2f252955-e410-4d61-bd7e-2cc60ecfe44d.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 19:49:55 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What a bad day for #Ubuntu to be down and under attack, especially with everyone looking for details on copy.fail and cPanel. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:22:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/nygren%40hachyderm.io">@<span>nygren</span></a></span> Wouldn't an nxdomain do that? But I'm not sure I would want to make any change like that. Surprised to see them pointing to a loopback, that is very unusual and seems like the wrong approach to me.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/jtk/statuses/116504956953135590</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/jtk/statuses/116504956953135590</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jtk@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:22:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What a bad day for #Ubuntu to be down and under attack, especially with everyone looking for details on copy.fail and cPanel. on Fri, 01 May 2026 19:57:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/nygren%40hachyderm.io">@<span>nygren</span></a></span> yeah, but it's nice to think that some DDoS folk might be hammering 127.0.0.1 as hard as they can?</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://layer8.space/users/damien/statuses/116501084730574461</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://layer8.space/users/damien/statuses/116501084730574461</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[damien@layer8.space]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 19:57:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What a bad day for #Ubuntu to be down and under attack, especially with everyone looking for details on copy.fail and cPanel. on Fri, 01 May 2026 19:51:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Side-note relative to:</p><p>$ host www.ubuntu.com<br />www.ubuntu.com has address 127.0.0.1<br />www.ubuntu.com has IPv6 address ::1</p><p>it would be good for "us" (IETF?) to define a better way to indicate "this site is authoritatively unavailable for now".  On IPv6 the discard prefix might be an option, but there's no clear option for IPv4.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://hachyderm.io/users/nygren/statuses/116501059617937678</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://hachyderm.io/users/nygren/statuses/116501059617937678</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nygren@hachyderm.io]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 19:51:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>