I'm not looking at the graph of Bitcoin. I am talking about it's long term theoretical value.

Yes. It's trajectory has been up. But think about how it operates. It has no intrinsic value and its cost of maintenance over time is prohibitive.

At the end of the day I am first and foremost an energy person. I used to work on energy networks as a consulting engineer.

When the electricity infrastructure fails to provide enough for the next Bitcoin unit, by all accounts it will trend to zero. That day will come. Just a matter of when

vote against Tufte; I know I am wierd but IMO he is a blowhard

much better to use the quiet lady who gets no credit:
https://www.amazon.com/Creating-Effective-Graphs-Naomi-Robbins/dp/0985911123

I want to show how easy it is for climate change deniers, anti vaxxers, etc to crop data, stretch or flip an axis and suggest the opposite of what the data is actually showing.

Ironic how you're talking about educating others about questioning misrepresented data, then outspokenly misrepresenting data in the next breath.

I'm not arguing for bitcoin -- it's an absolute disaster of volatility -- but you can't look at the long-term data and deny that its long term trajectory is up, even if you only measure the lows. Also, it's history it littered with detractors who bet against it by shorting it on the open markets -- and then got destroyed when it suddenly increased.

I'm not ignoring prior history - tulips, beany babies, internet companies circa 1999... Maybe you need to add a section at the end on how data can be good, but an idea can still be bad... But I hope it doesn't undermine the entirety of the rest of your message.

I don't. I'll look it up. Thanks

Great ideas. I honestly haven't thought it all through yet. I'll get working on it over the summer so may hit you up in July and August when I'm ready to piece it all together.

Thanks

Also the classic "scientific news progression" from a paper saying foo and bar may be correlated through univ. press saying "our scientist says foo could be a cause for bar" to popular press "Uni of Herethere scientists say foo causes bar".

A few communications thing that come to my mind in photography and video: One, using even the same photo or film but cropping it differently can give very different impression (e.g. person A hits person B, vs. a longer footage when person B first heavily abuses, or even hits, person A). Or how to make a photo of whatever number of people look like a crowd by lowering camera position and tightening the frame (I cannot unsee it since I learned about it). Or, lying by showing different photos claiming they're from elsewhere (difficult to check if you're not an expert - show any hurt people and they can be anywhere in the world). Or how a neutral-expression face looks either angry or sad depending on how you primed the watcher by narrative.

Anyway, you're doing an amazing thing for those students and for the better world, thank you!

Thx

Thanks.

Will go through all these resources as I really start to put the course together over the summer. Appreciate it

Just to get a plug in here, here are some examples of #DataVisualisation from the #30DayMapChallenge which shows what you can draw with this date, if nothing else
https://anisotropi4.github.io/shed/30daymapchallenge.html)

There is also @WorldPopProject
data https://hub.worldpop.org/. They have population and Global flight data https://hub.worldpop.org/project/categories?id=13

(Noting I'm a dilettante with a focus on European public transport and heavy rail...)

Thanks!

Thanks

Do you know if this exists for other countries?

Will look. Thanks

The majority of SCOTUS cases are disposed of via GVR. In a single order they (G)rant the request for SCOTUS review, (V)acate the lower court decision, and (R)emand to the lower court for further hearings — usually with a Post-It attached explaining to the lower court judge where they screwed up and what they should've done instead.

GVRs represent the majority of their output and are overwhelmingly (>90%) 7-2, 8-1, or 9-0.

Cases that get invited for full argument before the Court represent the smallest chunk of their output, and tend to break down 5-4 or 6-3 along predictable fault lines.

Very few national pundits nattering about the "factionalism" of SCOTUS are ever honest enough to talk about the GVR rate, or other measures which do not support the factionalization narrative.

In 1998, Bill Clinton read a book called The Cobra Event, about a biological terror attack on US soil. The ultimate outcome was two things: 1) the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS), and 2) a new anti-vaccine movement.

In the Fall of 2001, in the wake of 9/11, Dick Cheney watched the outcome of a war game exercise called "Dark Winter" and upped the stockpile to 300M vaccines.

Is there a non-zero possibility you might consider assigning fiction?

The Monterey Protocols - A novella for non-proliferation

A short fictional thriller posing pressing strategic questions on a set of latent issues in civil defense.

monterey-protocols (montereyprotocols.org)

The transport energy and environment data tables: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/energy-and-environment-data-tables-env
UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI) showing various emissions https://naei.energysecurity.gov.uk

(There is a bigger list of open data collated here https://anisotropi4.github.io/shed/opendata.html
It is less relevant to the ask but is stuff I have used in talks or visualisations.)

Thanks

Fraser I., is a conservative Canadian "Think tank" (political advocacy organization)

It releases a new "study" each year, it has received wide uncritical coverage in Canadian media for decades

https://www.policyalternatives.ca/wp-content/uploads/attachments/tax_freedom_day.pdf?x46002

Just a moment...

(pressprogress.ca)

Fair. Don't worry. It'll go back to zero.