<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[My guess is that NetBSD will ignore it until it has to be officially dealt with.]]></title><description><![CDATA[My guess is that NetBSD will ignore it until it has to be officially dealt with. <br /><br />That's my hope at least, and the track record of Slow and Steady from the NetBSD organization. <br /><br />Age verification requirement is such an affront to technical literacy, that it is doubtful to pass and be upheld without significant push back.<br /><br />What is the US going to do? Outlaw use of older "retro" operating systems that do not have Age Verification feature? <br /><br />It is ridiculous and unenforceable at so many levels. <br /><br /><a href="https://social.retroedge.tech/tag/ageverification" rel="tag ugc">#AgeVerification</a>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/2d90d934-033a-4f68-b75b-e2fc557cc0a8/my-guess-is-that-netbsd-will-ignore-it-until-it-has-to-be-officially-dealt-with.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 10:34:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/2d90d934-033a-4f68-b75b-e2fc557cc0a8.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:43:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>