<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[“Public confidence in the RCMP has been dramatically eroded over the past decade due to member misconduct,” the decision said.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>“Public confidence in the RCMP has been dramatically eroded over the past decade due to member misconduct,” the decision said.</p><p>“Each successive case of misconduct adjudicated and established by a conduct board contributes to that loss of public confidence.”</p><p><a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/hot-little-senorita-in-cells-bc-rcmp-officer-disciplined-for-taking-sharing-sexualized-photo-of-female-prisoner/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://www.</span><span>ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/h</span><span>ot-little-senorita-in-cells-bc-rcmp-officer-disciplined-for-taking-sharing-sexualized-photo-of-female-prisoner/</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/RCMP" rel="tag">#<span>RCMP</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/258c93cc-2f45-4389-9f2a-e2e8e2544c39/public-confidence-in-the-rcmp-has-been-dramatically-eroded-over-the-past-decade-due-to-member-misconduct-the-decision-said.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 03:47:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/258c93cc-2f45-4389-9f2a-e2e8e2544c39.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:29:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to “Public confidence in the RCMP has been dramatically eroded over the past decade due to member misconduct,” the decision said. on Tue, 05 May 2026 15:43:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/nmba%40mstdn.ca">@<span>NMBA</span></a></span> </p><p>And yet again the conduct board gives the officer a slap on the wrist (40 days pay and a 2 year promotion ban) rather than actual consequences.</p><p>He should have been fired and charged with voyeurism (criminal code 162(1)(c)).</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.ca/users/RantingCanuck/statuses/116522733864789036</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://mstdn.ca/users/RantingCanuck/statuses/116522733864789036</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rantingcanuck@mstdn.ca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:43:37 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>