<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[There are situations in which #kindness, or benefit, on a large scale would require #cruelty, or harm, on a small scale; and vice versa.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There are situations in which <a href="https://mindly.social/tags/kindness" rel="tag">#<span>kindness</span></a>, or benefit, on a large scale would require <a href="https://mindly.social/tags/cruelty" rel="tag">#<span>cruelty</span></a>, or harm, on a small scale; and vice versa.</p><p>Also, situations in which kindness, or benefit, in the present would lead to cruelty, or harm, in the future; and vice versa.</p><p>Generally: in which doing good (or bad) from one perspective functionally equals doing bad (or good) from another perspective.</p><p>Such tension among perspectives gives rise to difficult moral questions.</p><p>I sometimes think about this when I notice social media profiles or posts suggesting that "be kind" is an ideal single principle to live by.</p><p><a href="https://mindly.social/tags/morality" rel="tag">#<span>morality</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/1f854e44-db39-43b6-90b8-8d2fef2f7fd4/there-are-situations-in-which-kindness-or-benefit-on-a-large-scale-would-require-cruelty-or-harm-on-a-small-scale-and-vice-versa.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:42:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/1f854e44-db39-43b6-90b8-8d2fef2f7fd4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 18:18:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>