<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[One of these things is not like the other…😅]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>One of these things is not like the other…<img src="https://board.circlewithadot.net/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f605.png?v=28325c671da" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--sweat_smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="😅" alt="😅" /></p><p>I also reduced my dev time by 15%.  With <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/XTOL" rel="tag">#<span>XTOL</span></a> I didn’t really have to worry about that switching to rotation, but <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/HC110" rel="tag">#<span>HC110</span></a> seems a lot more sensitive to it based on the other negs I’ve scanned so far being super dense.  It looks to me like I could have reduced it further - but it’s hard to tell given these were shots of dark mountains and bright skies.  The two shots where it appears I clearly metered on the mountains look the best so far, but I am still looking forward to seeing how these scan.</p><p>I need to go take some pictures of some familiar spots with this film and developer combo to be a better benchmark. <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/LargeFormat" rel="tag">#<span>LargeFormat</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/DevelopYourOwn" rel="tag">#<span>DevelopYourOwn</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/1a0ef945-b357-4c89-9795-f8f9552d5f6d/one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:01:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/1a0ef945-b357-4c89-9795-f8f9552d5f6d.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 19:18:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>