<![CDATA[IPv6 was a mistake]]>IPv6 was a mistake

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/1739211b-aea6-414f-a373-4a4e64b95342/ipv6-was-a-mistakeRSS for NodeSat, 06 Jun 2026 05:22:33 GMTTue, 19 May 2026 05:28:31 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to IPv6 was a mistake on Wed, 20 May 2026 23:31:04 GMT]]>Cries in multi hour long ipv6 troubleshooting session

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://girlcock.club/ap/users/116240725080135751/statuses/116609506624416160https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://girlcock.club/ap/users/116240725080135751/statuses/116609506624416160Wed, 20 May 2026 23:31:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IPv6 was a mistake on Tue, 19 May 2026 07:36:43 GMT]]>@AltEvie I'm aware that some places like the Czech government is planning to phase out ipv4 in 2032 but for a 3 decade old standard, we're only seeing qa major push to migration now (Nintendo only implemented it with the switch 2) Some services like github are still ipv4 only.
And some ISPs are still ipv4 only (cmon optus).
Or have somewhat broken ipv6 implementations with the best solution being to force ipv4 over ipv6 or disable it outright (voda, super loop, exetel argh).

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://girlcock.club/ap/users/116240725080135751/statuses/116600091658208024https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://girlcock.club/ap/users/116240725080135751/statuses/116600091658208024Tue, 19 May 2026 07:36:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IPv6 was a mistake on Tue, 19 May 2026 06:09:28 GMT]]>@elvira Hasn’t people been saying the opposite? Like they’re gonna drop IPv4 on their websites and exclusively use IPv6? /genq

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://girlcock.club/ap/users/115678061070708483/statuses/116599748587064645https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://girlcock.club/ap/users/115678061070708483/statuses/116599748587064645Tue, 19 May 2026 06:09:28 GMT