<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Hot take: Accessibility should be a bipartison issue.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hot take: Accessibility should be a bipartison issue.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/11644c46-47d9-4ea3-b9e8-35469ce11c77/hot-take-accessibility-should-be-a-bipartison-issue.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 20:13:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/11644c46-47d9-4ea3-b9e8-35469ce11c77.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:47:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hot take: Accessibility should be a bipartison issue. on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:50:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/lockorientation%40tweesecake.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>LockOrientation</span></a></span> It is, in that disability doesn't care who you vote for. Unfortunately some people are very bad at figuring out what's in their best interest (hint: not the guys spending all their time bitching about white people not having enough power)</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/prism/statuses/116489731773218768</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/prism/statuses/116489731773218768</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[prism@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:50:45 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>