<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[@Mastodon #Mastodon content references on mastodon still look like this:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/mastodon%40mastodon.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>Mastodon</span></a></span> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Mastodon" rel="tag">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> content references on mastodon still look like this:<br /><img class="not-responsive emoji" src="https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/custom_emojis/images/000/170/641/original/72d670f0863a3d55.png" title=":blobcatfacepalm:" /></p>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/116/547/810/439/032/533/original/0d5588c7754bb442.png" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/09207d9b-66b2-4fb9-b565-d617ae29c4aa/@mastodon-mastodon-content-references-on-mastodon-still-look-like-this</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 23:32:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/09207d9b-66b2-4fb9-b565-d617ae29c4aa.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 02:03:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>