<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[#BookReview for &quot;Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray&quot; by Sabine HossenfelderMehLargely went over my head.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://mindly.social/tags/BookReview" rel="tag">#<span>BookReview</span></a> for "Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray" by Sabine Hossenfelder<br />Meh<br />Largely went over my head. My main takeaway: physics is hard. Author's key point seems to be that physicists cling to theories for reasons other than evidence? Maybe?<br />I did appreciate the personal touches in the book, such as mentioning the author's own mistakes or misadventures in interviewing people. <br />This book could have easily benefits from including audio of the interviews - especially the one playing the piano.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/0873eec9-7dcf-4549-bcf6-bb5ae3f76a87/bookreview-for-lost-in-math-how-beauty-leads-physics-astray-by-sabine-hossenfeldermehlargely-went-over-my-head.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:35:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/0873eec9-7dcf-4549-bcf6-bb5ae3f76a87.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:35:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>