<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Interesting.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. It would appear that something has changed on Hackernews around April 8. Up until that point, the daily line-up was pretty much dominated by stories written by AI or about AI. After that, it pretty much stopped.</p><p>(I've been tracking it for a while for fun.)</p>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/116/409/234/549/922/361/original/5ad5f2e86b201bb5.jpg" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/046b0f3e-3dad-423f-bdbd-e0159265a883/interesting.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:27:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/046b0f3e-3dad-423f-bdbd-e0159265a883.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:39:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting. on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:10:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/w00p%40infosec.exchange">@<span>w00p</span></a></span> Some "human" heuristics here: <a href="https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/when-it-comes-to-writing-llms-have" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>lcamtuf.substack.com/p/when-it</span><span>-comes-to-writing-llms-have</span></a> - but also, Pangram has gotten good enough that you can pretty much trust the tool (or, I have not seen a single case where its findings didn't align with what was apparent)</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/lcamtuf/statuses/116409355934254030</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/lcamtuf/statuses/116409355934254030</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lcamtuf@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:10:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting. on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:03:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/lcamtuf%40infosec.exchange">@<span>lcamtuf</span></a></span> how to you flag if it's ai generated or not? <img src="https://board.circlewithadot.net/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f914.png?v=28325c671da" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--thinking_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="🤔" alt="🤔" /></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/w00p/statuses/116409330873949316</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/w00p/statuses/116409330873949316</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[w00p@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:03:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting. on Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:52:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://aus.social/@stacey_campbell">@<span>stacey_campbell</span></a></span> You probably won't want to hear that, but almost every time someone says that to me on social media, I look at their feed, and I see they reshared AI-generated stories that just said something they like (often "AI is bad" / "political party X is bad").</p><p>And... I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm pretty sure you fell for it too. For example, this is almost certainly AI slop: https://mastodon[.]social/@jaimedavid99/116382857485892762</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/lcamtuf/statuses/116409287584235505</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/lcamtuf/statuses/116409287584235505</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lcamtuf@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:52:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>