<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Quite the interesting fresh FOSS drama.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p class="quote-inline">RE: <a href="https://fosstodon.org/@ONLYOFFICE/116323756094840918" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>fosstodon.org/@ONLYOFFICE/1163</span><span>23756094840918</span></a></p><p>Quite the interesting fresh FOSS drama. <br />Curious to see how this will turn out. Two <img src="https://board.circlewithadot.net/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f37a.png?v=28325c671da" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--beer" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="🍺" alt="🍺" /> on settlement. </p><p>Also, should the verdict go towards the Euro-Office fork will we see any precendence for other cases effectively weaking FOSS legal protection? Will distributors or integrators be impacted? </p><p><span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Karlitschek" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>Karlitschek</span></a></span> being a clear FOSS native will surely have a proper strategy &amp; plan forward laid out for this with his legal counsel. Or so one would hope.</p><p>Technically a pleasant product that one could only hope to be continued and advanced, ideally on combined man power of both parties.</p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/fossdrama" rel="tag">#<span>fossdrama</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/fosscompliance" rel="tag">#<span>fosscompliance</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/onlyoffice" rel="tag">#<span>onlyoffice</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/eurooffice" rel="tag">#<span>eurooffice</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/drama" rel="tag">#<span>drama</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/foss" rel="tag">#<span>foss</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/042b7a1b-7e6c-4dbb-8a7b-c47849aa24ac/quite-the-interesting-fresh-foss-drama.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 18:08:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/042b7a1b-7e6c-4dbb-8a7b-c47849aa24ac.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:24:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Quite the interesting fresh FOSS drama. on Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:39:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[I'm unsure the <a href="https://social.sirtao.it/social?t=eurooffice" rel="tag">#EuroOffice</a> people might <i>want</i> to settle.<br /><br />Actually getting a judge to put down a precedent could be a good investment to keep developerso to add not-so-FOSS additions to open licenses.<br />From my limited experience, it's uncommon for licenses getting litigated up to a verdict, which is arguably part of the issue with non-open licenses: their requests are often so disproportionate they might end up be torn out by a formal sentence.<br /><br />Of course, this would require them to be reasonably sure of winning it out, but somehow I don't think they would have started in first place if they thought otherwise<br /><br />CC: <span><a href="/user/karlitschek%40mastodon.social">@Karlitschek@mastodon.social</a></span><br />]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.sirtao.it/social/sirtao/p/1774967954.957668</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://social.sirtao.it/social/sirtao/p/1774967954.957668</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sirtao@social.sirtao.it]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:39:14 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>