<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with sqlite3]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with sqlite3]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/sqlite3</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:19:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/sqlite3.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[This codebase uses SQLite3.]]></title><description><![CDATA[This codebase uses SQLite3.  Valgrind reports a huge amount of lost memory, one entry for every DB query.But every sqlite3_prepare_v2() is correctly followed by sqlite3_finalize().  I love Valgrind, but sometimes the output is difficult to interpret.  #SQLite3 #Valgrind]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/2f0316ad-b57b-420a-8e2b-12e13b77d3af/this-codebase-uses-sqlite3.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/2f0316ad-b57b-420a-8e2b-12e13b77d3af/this-codebase-uses-sqlite3.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[charette@mstdn.ca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>