<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with sovreignty]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with sovreignty]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/sovreignty</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 01:17:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/sovreignty.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[In retrospect, it&#x27;s completely incredible that apparently not for a moment did the team behind the 1981 UK Computer Literacy Project consider a non-British-built computer as the project&#x27;s flagship.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@fluidlogic The naming amuses me now that I am reading this.  At that time computers were huge but the BBC by today's standard is far from micro.  I have several pi's, couple of NVidia's and a couple of Mac's and they are all bigger.]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/cfa2bf30-9b7f-4088-8977-b866d1950b0e/in-retrospect-it-s-completely-incredible-that-apparently-not-for-a-moment-did-the-team-behind-the-1981-uk-computer-literacy-project-consider-a-non-british-built-computer-as-the-project-s-flagship.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/cfa2bf30-9b7f-4088-8977-b866d1950b0e/in-retrospect-it-s-completely-incredible-that-apparently-not-for-a-moment-did-the-team-behind-the-1981-uk-computer-literacy-project-consider-a-non-british-built-computer-as-the-project-s-flagship.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jamie@friendica.hubup.pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>