<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with skweather]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with skweather]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/skweather</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:03:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/tags/skweather.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[It is extremely surprising, but for once, this is NOT Saskatchewan.]]></title><description><![CDATA[@AlaskaWx @transitionalaspect According to @NunavutBirder, the extreme weather in at least one part of Nunavut this weekend was more about wind strong enough to turn metal shipping containers into tumbleweeds. But their standards for earning a yellow warning out of Environment Canada may be higher?One thing has been consistent across the whole country (+Alaska too, I'm sure): we've all been getting extreme weather impacts from that loop-de-loop in the jet stream, but exactly what that means seems to vary by whether you're inside, outside, or right on the loop!]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/f72670e4-6582-470b-84fe-5cd1a2289d0e/it-is-extremely-surprising-but-for-once-this-is-not-saskatchewan.</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/f72670e4-6582-470b-84fe-5cd1a2289d0e/it-is-extremely-surprising-but-for-once-this-is-not-saskatchewan.</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ameliasbrain@mstdn.ca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>